Application Security Baseline Requirements
Specification
Establish, document and maintain baseline requirements for securing applications."
Threat coverage
Architectural relevance
Lifecycle
Data storage, Data curation, Data collection
Design, Guardrails, Supply Chain, Training
Validation/Red Teaming, Evaluation, Re-evaluation
AI Services supply chain, AI applications
Continuous monitoring, Continuous improvement, Maintenance, Operations
Archiving
Ownership / SSRM
PI
Shared Cloud Service Provider-Model Provider (Shared CSP-MP)
The CSP and MP are jointly responsible and accountable for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer.
Model
Owned by the Model Provider (MP)
The model provider (MP) designs, develops, and implements the control as part of their services or products to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with the Large Language Model (LLM). Model Providers are entities that develop, train, and distribute foundational and fine-tuned AI models for various applications. They create the underlying AI capabilities that other actors build upon. Model Providers are responsible for model architecture, training methodologies, performance characteristics, and documentation of capabilities and limitations. They operate at the foundation layer of the AI stack and may provide direct API access to their models. Examples: OpenAI (GPT, DALL-E, Whisper), Anthropic(Claude), Google(Gemini), Meta(Llama), as well as any customized model.
Orchestrated
Shared Orchestrated Service Provider-Application Provider (Shared OSP-AP)
The OSP and AP are jointly responsible and accountable for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer.
Application
Owned by the Application Provider (AP)
The Application Provider (AP) is responsible for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer. The AP is responsible and accountable for the implementation of the control within its own infrastructure/environment. If the control has downstream implications on the users/customers, the AP is responsible for enabling the customer and/or upstream partner in the implementation/configuration of the control within their risk management approach. The AP is accountable for carrying out the due diligence on its upstream providers (e.g MPs, Orchestrated Services) to verify that they implement the control as it relates to the service/product develop and offered by the AP. These providers build and offer end-user applications that leverage generative AI models for specific tasks such as content creation, chatbots, code generation, and enterprise automation. These applications are often delivered as software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions. These providers focus on user interfaces, application logic, domain-specific functionality, and overall user experience rather than underlying model development. Example: OpenAI (GPTs,Assistants), Zapier, CustomGPT, Microsoft Copilot (integrated into Office products), Jasper (AI-driven content generation), Notion AI (AI-enhanced productivity tools), Adobe Firefly (AI-generated media), and AI-powered customer service solutions like Amazon Rufus, as well as any organization that develops its AI-based application internally.
Implementation guidelines
Auditing guidelines
1. Examine policy and procedures for adequacy and effectiveness. 2. Determine if security baseline requirements of respective applications are clearly defined. 3. Examine the process to determine the baseline security for AI-enabling services. (The above are from CCM and apply here as well.)
Standards mappings
42001: 6.1.2 42001: B.6.2.2 42001: B.7.2 27001:6.1.2 27001:6.1.3 27001: A.8.26
Addendum
Explicitly require the definition, documentation, and periodic maintenance of baseline application security requirements.
Article 11 Article 15 (1) Article 53 and Annex XI Article 55
Addendum
N/A
GV-6.1-004 GV-6.1-005
Addendum
Define application-specific security baseline frameworks, including authentication, encryption, and access control requirements. Establish a baseline validation and compliance tracking mechanism. Enhance policy enforcement mechanisms to explicitly define application security requirements for AI-related technologies.
DEV-01 DEV-03 OPS-04 OPS-06 OPS-10 OPS-11 OPS-18 OPS-23 PS-01
Addendum
N/A
AI-CAIQ questions (1)
Are baseline requirements for securing applications established, documented, and maintained?