Acceptable Use of Technology Policy and Procedures
Specification
Establish, document, approve, communicate, apply, evaluate and maintain policies and procedures for defining allowances and conditions for the acceptable use of organizationally-owned or managed assets. Review and update the policies and procedures at least annually.
Threat coverage
Architectural relevance
Lifecycle
Team and expertise
Supply Chain
Not applicable
AI Services supply chain
Not applicable
Not applicable
Ownership / SSRM
PI
Shared Cloud Service Provider-Model Provider (Shared CSP-MP)
The CSP and MP are jointly responsible and accountable for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer.
Model
Owned by the Model Provider (MP)
The model provider (MP) designs, develops, and implements the control as part of their services or products to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with the Large Language Model (LLM). Model Providers are entities that develop, train, and distribute foundational and fine-tuned AI models for various applications. They create the underlying AI capabilities that other actors build upon. Model Providers are responsible for model architecture, training methodologies, performance characteristics, and documentation of capabilities and limitations. They operate at the foundation layer of the AI stack and may provide direct API access to their models. Examples: OpenAI (GPT, DALL-E, Whisper), Anthropic(Claude), Google(Gemini), Meta(Llama), as well as any customized model.
Orchestrated
Shared Cloud Service Provider-Model Provider (Shared CSP-MP)
The CSP and MP are jointly responsible and accountable for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer.
Application
Shared across the supply chain
Shared control ownership refers to responsibilities and activities related to LLM security that are distributed across multiple stakeholders within the AI supply chain, including the Cloud Service Provider (CSP), Model Provider (MP), Orchestrated Service Provider (OSP), Application Provider (AP), and Customer (AIC). These controls require coordinated actions, communication, and governance across all involved parties to ensure their effectiveness.
Implementation guidelines
Auditing guidelines
1. Policy Establishment and Documentation: Verify that the CSP has established and documented two distinct AUPs, an internal AUP for employees and contractors, addressing acceptable and prohibited use of customer environments and data, and a published AUP for customers, defining acceptable and prohibited use of CSP services and infrastructure by tenants. 2. Policy Communication and Acknowledgement: Confirm that the internal AUP is communicated to all CSP employees and contractors, with signed acknowledgements retained. Verify that the customer‑facing AUP is published and easily accessible to all customers (e.g., through terms of service, portal links). 3. Content of the Internal AUP: Verify that the internal AUP explicitly prohibits unauthorized access to or use of customer environments, data, or resources; unauthorized changes to customer configurations or services; and disclosure of sensitive customer information. Confirm the AUP defines consequences for violations and outlines escalation and reporting procedures. 4. Content of the Customer‑Facing AUP: Verify that the customer‑facing AUP explicitly prohibits use of CSP services for illegal or prohibited activities, abuse of resources (e.g., unauthorized crypto‑mining, spamming, denial‑of‑service attacks), and launching attacks or unauthorized access attempts originating from the customer’s tenancy. Confirm the AUP clearly defines enforcement actions (e.g., suspension or termination of services for violations). 5. Monitoring and Enforcement: Verify that monitoring mechanisms are in place to detect violations of both the internal and customer‑facing AUPs. Ensure that documented procedures exist to investigate violations, notify relevant parties, and apply corrective actions. 6. Periodic Review and Maintenance: Confirm that both the internal and customer‑facing AUPs are reviewed and updated at least annually, or after significant changes to services, laws, or customer expectations. Verify that evidence of review and approval is maintained. From CCM: 1. Examine policy for adequacy, currency, communication, and effectiveness. 2. Verify that a definition of organizationally-owned or managed assets exists, and is implemented. 3. Verify, through interviews or otherwise, that the policy is communicated to users. 4. Examine policy and procedures for evidence of review at least annually.
Standards mappings
42001: A.2.2 AI Policy 42001: A.2.3 Alignment with other organizational policies 42001: A.2.4 Review of AI Policy 27001: 5.1 Leadership and commitment 27001: 5.2 Policy 27001: 7.3 Awareness 27001: 7.4 Communication 27001: 7.5 Documented Information 27001: 9.1 Monitoring measurement analysis and evaluation 27001: 9.3 Management Review 27001: A.5.1 Policies for information security 27001: A.5.4 Management responsibilities 27001: A.5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets 27001: A.5.37 Documented operating procedures 27002: 5.1 Policies for information security 27002: 5.4 Management responsibilities 27002: 5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets 27002: 5.37 Documented operating procedures
Addendum
N/A
Article 53 (1) Annex XI Annex XII
Addendum
Coverage on organization-wide policies on acceptable use of managed assets, and requirements for communication, role-based enforcement, and annual review cycles.
GV-6.1-010 GV-1.4-002 GV-3.2-003 GV-1.3-004 A.1.2
Addendum
N/A
HR-02 AM-05
Addendum
N/A
AI-CAIQ questions (2)
Are policies and procedures for defining allowances and conditions for the acceptable use of organizationally-owned or managed assets established, documented, approved, communicated, applied, evaluated, and maintained?
Are the policies and procedures for defining allowances and conditions for the acceptable use of organizationally-owned or managed assets reviewed and updated at least annually?