Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures
Specification
Establish, document, approve, communicate, implement, apply, evaluate and maintain policies and procedures for identity and access management. Review and update the policies and procedures at least annually, or upon significant changes.
Threat coverage
Architectural relevance
Lifecycle
Data collection, Data storage, Team and expertise
Design, Supply Chain
Evaluation
Orchestration, AI Services supply chain, AI applications
Operations, Maintenance, Continuous improvement
Archiving, Data deletion, Model disposal
Ownership / SSRM
PI
Shared Cloud Service Provider-Model Provider (Shared CSP-MP)
The CSP and MP are jointly responsible and accountable for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer.
Model
Owned by the Model Provider (MP)
The model provider (MP) designs, develops, and implements the control as part of their services or products to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with the Large Language Model (LLM). Model Providers are entities that develop, train, and distribute foundational and fine-tuned AI models for various applications. They create the underlying AI capabilities that other actors build upon. Model Providers are responsible for model architecture, training methodologies, performance characteristics, and documentation of capabilities and limitations. They operate at the foundation layer of the AI stack and may provide direct API access to their models. Examples: OpenAI (GPT, DALL-E, Whisper), Anthropic(Claude), Google(Gemini), Meta(Llama), as well as any customized model.
Orchestrated
Owned by the Orchestrated Service Provider (OSP)
The Orchestrated Service Provider (OSP) is responsible for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they develop and offer. The OSP is responsible and accountable for the implementation of the control within its own infrastructure/environment. If the control has downstream implications on the users/customers, the OSP is responsible for enabling the customer and/or upstream partner in the implementation/configuration of the control within their risk management approach. The OSP is accountable for ensuring that its providers upstream (e.g MPs) implement the control as it relates to the service/product the develop and offered by the OSP. This refers to entities that create the technical building blocks and management tools that enable AI implementation. This can include platforms, frameworks, and tools that facilitate the integration, deployment, and management of AI models within enterprise workflows. These providers focus on model orchestration and offer services like API access, automated scaling, prompt management, workflow automation, monitoring, and governance rather than end-user functionality or raw infrastructure. They help businesses implement AI in a structured and efficient manner. Examples: AWS, Azure, GCP, OpenAI, Anthropic, LangChain (for AI workflow orchestration), Anyscale (Ray for distributed AI workloads), Databricks (MLflow), IBM Watson Orchestrate, and developer platforms like Google AI Studio.
Application
Shared Application Provider-AI Customer (Shared AP-AIC)
The AP and AIC both share responsibility and accountability for the design, development, implementation, and enforcement of the control to mitigate security, privacy, or compliance risks associated with Large Language Model (LLM)/GenAI technologies in the context of the services or products they offer and consume.
Implementation guidelines
Auditing guidelines
1. Verify that IAM policies cover cloud infrastructure hosting AI components, including compute, storage, and networking. 2. Confirm the CSP enforces IAM policies for internal operators managing AI workloads or model containers. 3. Ensure policies include fine-grained access controls using IAM roles, service accounts, and conditions. 4. Validate that CSP IAM policies are reviewed periodically, with evidence of updates tied to service-level risk assessments. 5. Check compliance with regulatory IAM requirements (e.g., GDPR, FedRAMP) and alignment with cloud-native security frameworks (e.g., AWS IAM, GCP IAM). From CCM: 1. Examine policy and/or procedures related to identity and access management to determine if policy and/or procedure content: a. addresses the provisioning, modification and deprovisioning of logical access. b. establishes password complexity and management requirements. c. addresses authorization concept following separation of duties and least privilege. d. addresses privileged access management and access reviews. e. includes roles and responsibilities for provisioning, modifying and deprovisioning of logical access. f. understands the delineation of identity and access management control responsibility in relation to the shared responsibility model. 2. Determine if the policy is clearly communicated and available to stakeholders. 3. Examine if policy and procedures are reviewed and updated at least annually.
Standards mappings
42001 A.2.3 - Alignment with other organizational policies 42001 A.2.4 - Review of the AI policy 27001 A.5.1 - Policies for information security 27001 A.5.36 - Compliance with policies rules and standards for information security 27001 A.5.15 - Access control
Addendum
N/A
Article 9 Article 10 Article 12
Addendum
Add specific time period of review for Article 12.
No Mapping
Addendum
No explicit reference to policies and procedures in the domain of identity and access management is made in the NIST AI 600-1 standard.
C4 PC-02 C5 IDM-01
Addendum
N/A
AI-CAIQ questions (2)
Are Identity and Access Management policies and procedures established, documented, approved, communicated, implemented, applied, evaluated, and maintained for identity and access management?
Are Identity and Access Management Policies and Procedures reviewed and updated at least annually, or upon significant changes?